August 29: Early Gospels, our projects
Assignment
Note: we will begin this class with a presentation on the job and grad school application process by Adrienne Jablonski, the College’s wonderful corporate relations person.
Please prepare by doing these four five things:
- Take a quick look at the notes I posted after last week’s class.
- Read all the way through the syllabus. If you have any questions, please ask them in class today. I don’t want anything to catch you by surprise later!
- Read the following passages in the Bible (any translation):
- The whole Gospel of Mark
- Matthew chapters 1-7
- Luke chapters 22-24
- John chapters 1-3
(We are starting with these New Testament passages not because they are some kind of objective baseline against which all other portraits of Jesus should be measured, but because they are the main reference point of most of the gospels we will be reading, and I don’t want to take knowledge of them for granted. Furthermore, they are interesting constructions of Jesus in their own right, and we should think about how and why each of these gospel writers constructed his own portrait of Jesus.)
- Read the Infancy Gospel of Thomas (handed out in class). How does this construction of Jesus differ from the New Testament gospels, and how does it resemble them?
- Think about this (and be prepared to present your answer in class): If you were to write a gospel, what would it be like? For instance, think about:
- Would your gospel focus on Jesus’ teachings?
- Would it include miracles?
- Would it be historical-critical?
- Would it explain the significance of Jesus’ death?
- What kind of person would Jesus come across as–kind, powerful, wise, radical…?
- What would Jesus stand for?
- What significance would you want Jesus to have for your your audience?
- Who is your audience, anyway–modern skeptical people, “spiritual but not religious” people, Bible Belt Christians, Muslims, or atheists?
- What is the cultural context in which you are writing, and how should that cultural context shape your writing?
- Will your Jesus fit into your culture, or will you depict a counter-cultural Jesus?
- What purpose would you like to your gospel to fulfill?
Notes from class
I hope the time we took to help you get thinking more about and acting on your post-college plans will prove beneficial. We’ll come back to that periodically and briefly. Three resources to remember:
- Your Handshake account (via hiresooner.com, or directly at http://www.ou.edu/career/students/our-services/online-resources/handshake.html) which helps you find relevant job listings.
- “Going global” for job openings abroad, at http://www.ou.edu/career/students/our-services/online-resources/going-global.html.
- Adrienne Jablonski, who offers individual appointments (ajablonski@ou.edu).
Our discussion of the “Infancy Gospel of Thomas” (IGT) and the canonical Gospels yielded:
- Contrary to what Ehrman said, the IGT does attempt to resolve the problem of Jesus’ violence and bratty attitude by showing him heal those he hurt and by showing his character developing over time.
- And the IGT does fit with the rather oppositional character Jesus has in Mark.
- The alternate beginning of IGT (text C) also echoes the Moses motif from Matthew.
- And IGT clearly was written by people who kn\ew the canonical Gospels quite well, and echoes them in many ways.
- But we think IGT’s Jesus violates some essential elements of the Gospel’s portrait of Jesus, like his kindliness emphasized by Luke, and like the orthodox doctrine of his sinlessness.
- We will continue to think about orthodoxies: do they define the essences of religions, and of figures like Jesus, or are they just the perspectives of the powerful who imposed their ideas on others?
Recent Comments in this Document
December 12, 2017 at 12:47 am
As previously stated, it is an invitation for all, regardless of race, to believe in Jesus as the Savior of all mankind. The reader should see that all those around him/her have that same opportunity as they do to come to the knowledge of Jesus’ divine power to save.
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:45 am
Here, I attempt to show the reader that Thomas is believing because Jesus is present with him. That belief goes away the same time Jesus goes away. Thomas is holding onto this idea that if Jesus goes away, His power and divinity disappear as well.
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:43 am
Traditional site of Thomas’ martyrdom
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:42 am
Robert Frykenberg notes, “What had begun with the Thomas Tradition–belief that the Apostle brought the Gospel to India in AD 52–remains extremely strong, whatever the historicity of this tradition may be. Thomas Christians continue to respond to sceptics that the evidence for Thomas coming to India is as strong as the evidence for Peter coming to Rome. The presence of the Gospel in India, from this perspective, antedates any canon, creed, or council in the West” (Christianity in India: From Beginnings to the Present).
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:37 am
See Matthew 28:19
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:27 am
This is not to be seen as Jesus chastising Thomas. It should be seen as an internal struggle. Thomas is asking himself, “Why did I not believe?” “What is wrong with me?”
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:25 am
As discussed in the opening comments, this is directed towards those who desire tangible evidence of Jesus’ divinity. It brings the concept of faith in the picture. I agree with the definition of faith given in Hebrews 11:1 which reads, “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:21 am
This final chapter on the resurrection of Jesus is addressed to those who hold atheist or agnostic views. These two traditions are generally thought of wanting tangible evidence or proven by science. Therefore, I felt it was key to use Thomas who lacked faith and wanted tangible evidence that Jesus indeed lived again. It also shows that even the most stubborn of people stuck in their ways can accept Jesus as the Savior of all mankind. With the desire for tangible evidence it also brings in the concept of faith and its importance.
The latter portion of this chapter reiterates the message of the previous chapter. Jesus is the Savior of the world regardless of race. For this purpose it was important to include Thomas’ travels to the subcontinent of India.
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:12 am
Although brief, this verse should give purpose to Jesus’ death. If this had not been included the reader would question why Jesus had died. He had to have a purpose in dying or a reason or it would simply imply the Pharisees finally caught up to Jesus.
See in context
December 12, 2017 at 12:08 am
I speculate that this was done in secret as the Roman soldier is wary of the penalty of such an act. I am not familiar with Roman law but I think the consequences would be heavy should he be caught conversing with the Jews.
See in context